Friday, April 30, 2021

Falaite ‘Epeleli 30, 2021

concerning that day and hour  no one knows

ko e me‘a ki he ‘aho ko ia mo hono houa, ‘oku ‘ikai ha taha ‘oku ‘ilo ki ai 

 Matiu 24(Matthew 24)

(v. 36) “But concerning that day and hour  no one knows, not even the angels of heaven,  nor the Son,   but the Father only.

(v. 36) Ka ko e me‘a ki he ‘aho ko ia mo hono houa, ‘oku ‘ikai ha taha ‘oku ‘ilo ki ai; ‘io, pe ko e kau ‘āngelo ‘i he langi; pea na‘a mo e ‘Alo ‘oku ‘ikai; ngata pē ‘i he Tamai toko taha.

 

*Commentary: The NIV Study Bible*

24:36 In response to the disciples asking, "when will these things be?" (v. 3), Jesus says no one knows, not even ... the Son, but the Father only. In his incarnate life, Jesus learned things as other human beings learn them (cf. Luke 2:52; Heb. 5:8). On the other hand, Jesus was also fully God, and, as God, he had infinite knowledge (cf. John 2:25; 16:30; 21:17). Here he is apparently speaking in terms of his human nature. This is similar to other statements about Jesus which could be true of his human nature only, and not of his divine nature (he grew and became strong, Luke 2:40; increased in stature, Luke 2:52; was about 30 years old , Luke 3:23; was weary, John 4:6; was thirsty, John 19:28; was hungry, Matt. 4:2; was crucified, 1 Cor. 2:8). Taking account of these verses, together with many verses that affirm Christ's deity, the Council of Chalcedon in A.D. 451 affirmed that Christ was “perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man." Yet it also affirmed that Jesus was "one Person and one Subsistence." With regard to the properties of his human nature and his divine nature, the Chalcedonian Creed affirmed that Christ was to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably , indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved." That meant the properties of deity and the properties of humanity were both preserved. How Jesus could have limited knowledge and yet know all things is difficult, and much remains a mystery, for nobody else has ever been both God and man. One possibility is that Jesus regularly lived on the basis of his human knowledge but could at any time call to mind anything from his infinite knowledge.

Thursday, April 29, 2021

 Tuʻapulelulu ‘Epeleli 29, 2021

call no man your father on earth

‘oua na‘a ui ha toko taha ‘i māmani ko ho‘omou tamai 

Matiu 22 (Matthew 22)

(v. 8-10) 8 But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. 9 And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. 10 Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ.

(v. 8-10) 8 Ka ko kimoutolu ‘oua na‘a ui ko Lāpai: he ‘oku taha pē ho‘omou Faiako, ka ko kimoutolu ko e ngaahi tokoua kotoa pē. 9 Pea ‘oua na‘a ui ha toko taha ‘i māmani ko ho‘omou tamai: he ‘oku taha pē ho‘omou Tamai, ko e Tamai Fakalangi. 10 Kae‘uma‘ā ‘oua na‘a ui kimoutolu ko e kau takimu‘a: he ‘oku taha homou Takimu‘a, ko Kalaisi.

 

*Commentary: The Reformation Study Bible*

23:8-10 In forbidding the use of the titles "rabbi," teacher" (v. 8), "father" (v.9), and instructors" (lit. "leaders," v. 10), Jesus does not prohibit organization or the use of all titles in the church (cf. Acts 20:17; 1 Cor. 9:1; 1 Tim. 3:1, 2, 8, 12; Titus 1:5-7). His warning is against the temptation to claim for oneself authority and honor that belong uniquely to God and His Christ.

Wednesday, April 28, 2021

 Pulelulu ‘Epeleli 28, 2021

and to God the things that are God’s

ki he ‘Otua ‘a e ngaahi me‘a ‘a e ‘Otua 

Matiu 22 (Matthew 22)

(v. 20-21) 20 And Jesus said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” 21 They said, “Caesar’s.” Then he said to them, “Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”

(v. 20-21) 20 Pea pehē ‘e ia kiate kinautolu, Ko e fofonga ‘ena mo e hingoa ‘o hai? 21 Pea nau pehē, ‘o Sisa. Pea folofola ‘e ia kiate kinautolu, Pe‘i ‘ange kia Sisa ‘a e ngaahi me‘a ‘a Sisa; pea ki he ‘Otua ‘a e ngaahi me‘a ‘a e ‘Otua.

 

*Commentary: The Reformation Study Bible*

22:20, 21 Whose likeness and inscription. The Roman denarius bears an

image of the reigning Caesar and declares him to be a son of the gods, violating the first and second commandments. Jesus' answer turns the question to a deeper issue than one's relationship to political institutions, pagan or otherwise. Jesus calls for ultimate allegiance to God. The coin bearing the image of Caesar belongs to him; human beings made in the image of God belong to God.

Tuesday, April 27, 2021

 Tusite ‘Epeleli 27, 2021

“Hosanna to the Son of David!”

Hōsana ki he Hako ‘o Tēvita!

Matiu 21 (Matthew 21)

(v. 9) And the crowds that went before him and that followed him were shouting, “Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord! Hosanna in the highest!”

(v. 9) Pea ko e fu‘u kakai na‘e ‘alu mu‘omu‘a ‘iate ia, pea mo kinautolu na‘e muimui mai, na‘a nau fekālanga‘i ‘o pehē, Hōsana ki he Hako ‘o Tēvita!

Hoto ‘ofa kiate ia ‘oku hoko mai ‘i he huafa ‘o e ‘Eiki! Hōsana ki Langi Taupotu!

 

*Commentary: The Reformation Study Bible*

21:9 Hosanna. A Hb. expression meaning, "Save!" drawn by the crowds from Ps. 118:25, (Save us, we pray, O Lord! O Lord, we pray, give us success!) which speaks of the Messiah's entering the gates of righteousness (vv. 19,20) to the acclamation of his subjects, "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!" (v.26).

 

*Commentary: David Guzik - Study Guide on Matthew*

Jesus received and indeed encouraged this worship. Again, this was because this is the day that the Lord has made (Psalm 118:24), the day when the Messiah came as Savior to Jerusalem in fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy.

” ‘Hosanna’ transliterates the Hebrew expression that originally was a cry for help: ‘Save!’…In time it became an invocation of blessing and even an acclamation…The people praise God in the highest heavens for sending the Messiah and, if ‘Hosanna’ retains some of its original force, also cry to him for deliverance.” (Carson)

“Essentially it is a people’s cry for deliverance and for help in the day of their trouble; it is an oppressed people’s cry to their saviour and their king.” (Barclay)

Monday, April 26, 2021

 Monite ‘Epeleli 26, 2021

hire laborers for his vineyard

unga ha ni‘ihi ke ngāue ‘i he‘ene ngoue vaine

Matiu 20 (Matthew 20)

(v. 1) For the kingdom of heaven is like a master of a house who went out early in the morning to hire laborers for his vineyard.

(v. 1) HE ko e Pule‘anga ‘o Hēvani ‘oku tatau mo ha tangata‘eiki, ‘a ia na‘a ne ‘alu atu hengihengi pē ke unga ha ni‘ihi ke ngāue ‘i he‘ene ngoue vaine.

 

*Commentary: The Reformation Study Bible*

20:1 vineyard. Israel is symbolized as God's vineyard in the OT (Ps. 80:8-13; Is.3:14; 5:1-7) and in Jesus' later parables (Matt. 21:28, 33). This symbolism and the apparent inequity of the workers' compensation show that the story is not about workers' rights in this world but about how mercy transcends mere justice in the kingdom of heaven.

GOD IS . . . (KO E ‘OTUA, ‘OKU . . )

4        GOD IS INFINITE

            Application

The doctrine of God's infinity gives us great joy because it assures us that our sins are forgiven, due to the infinite worth of Christ's sacrifice. Additionally, we can rejoice that we, as finite creatures, can never comprehend the infinite. Far from being a problem, this doctrine is a delight, for we shall one day be given glorious resurrected bodies. As Paul says, “Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven" (1 Cor. 15:49).

In this exalted state, we will be able to perfectly apply our minds to the knowledge of God and Christ by means of the Holy Spirit illuminating our spiritual and intellectual faculties. We shall spend an eternity knowing God, because he is the infinite God. Yet even for all eternity, we shall never fully comprehend God. Still, this impossibility remains our delight insofar as we have so much to look forward to in what awaits us. By knowing God, I do not mean merely coming to a greater awareness of who he is but also

coming to a greater awareness of all that he has done and will continue to do for us, including our understanding of his attributes displayed in the new creation. We all, for example, shall be true scientists of the highest order.

But we should always remember our established place as creatures. We serve an infinite God, and our praises in this life come so very short of what is due to him. But he accepts our praises, despite our weaknesses. The Infinite One stoops and stoops and stoops in order to raise us to places that are undeserved. Our union with the infinite Son of God puts us in the most privileged place possible for a human being-far more privileged than Adam's place in the garden. We belong to an infinite God who will satisfy us forever because he alone is in the position to pour out everlasting blessings on his creatures. As Matthew Mead puts it,

Alas! it is an infinite righteousness that must satisfy for our sins, for it is an infinite God that is offended by us. If ever your sin be pardoned, it is infinite mercy that must pardon it; if ever you be reconciled to God, it is infinite merit must do it; if ever your heart be changed, and your soul renewed, it is infinite power must effect it, and if ever your soul escape hell, and be saved at last, it is infinite grace must save it."

Sunday, April 25, 2021

Sapate ‘Epeleli 25, 2021

Ko e Talavou Koloa‘ia

The rich young man 

Matiu 19 (Matthew 19)

(v. 16-22) 16 And behold, a man came up to him, saying, “Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?” 17 And he said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments.” 18 He said to him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not murder, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, 19 Honor your father and mother, and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” 20 The young man said to him, “All these I have kept. What do I still lack?” 21 Jesus said to him, “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.” 22 When the young man heard this he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions.

(v. 16-22) 16 Pea ‘iloange na‘e ha‘u kiate ia ha toko taha, ‘o ne pehē, Tangata‘eiki, ko e hā ha ngāue lelei ke u fai, ka u ma‘u ai ‘a e mo‘ui ta‘engata? 17 Pea tali ‘e ia, ko e hā ‘oku ke ‘eke ai kiate au ‘i he lelei? ‘Oku Toko Taha pē ‘a e lelei: ka ‘o kapau ko ho loto ke ke hū ki he mo‘ui, pea ke ke tauhi ‘a e ngaahi fekau. 18 Pea pehē ‘e ia, ‘a e fē fua?. Pea pehē ‘e Sīsū, ‘A ‘eni, ‘E ‘ikai te ke fakapō, ‘E ‘ikai te ke fe‘auaki, ‘E ‘ikai te ke kaiha‘a, ‘E ‘ikai te ke tukuaki. 19 Faka‘apa‘apa ki ho‘o tamai mo ho‘o fa‘ē: pea, Te ke ‘ofa ki ho kaungā‘api ‘o hangē pē ko ho‘o ‘ofa kiate koe. 20 Pea lea ‘e he talavou kiate ia, Kuo u tauhi kotoa ‘a e ngaahi lao ko ia: ko e hā ‘aku ‘oku kei toe ke fai? 21 Pea lea ‘a Sīsū ki ai, Kapau ko ho loto ke ke haohaoa, mole pē ‘o fakatau atu ho‘o nga‘oto‘ota, pea foaki hono pa‘anga ki he masiva, pea ‘e ai ha koloa ‘e fa‘oaki ma‘au ‘i Hēvani: pea ke ha‘u ‘o kau ‘i hoku lahi. 22 Pea ‘i he fanongo ‘a e talavou ki he lea ko ia na‘a ne foki kuo mamahi: he ko e toko taha ia na‘e ma‘u me‘a lahi.

 

*Commentary: The NIV Study Bible*

19:16 a man came up to him. Verses 16–22 have been called the story of the "rich young ruler" since he is rich (v. 22), young v. 20), and a ruler (cf. Luke 18:18). He may have been a religious lay leader, quite possibly a Pharisee (because of the diligence he displays in following the law). After addressing Jesus as Teacher, a title of respect, he asks what good deed he must do to have eternal life. "Eternal life" is virtually synonymous with expressions such as "entering the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5:20) and being "saved" (19:25-26); it is the first occurrence of this expression in Matthew (cf. v. 29; 25:46). In the parallel accounts (Mark 10:17-22; Luke

18:18-23), the wording of the question and answer differs some what, but there is no contradiction, and it seems to be a case of different Gospels reporting different parts of the same conversation.

 

*Commentary: The Reformation Bible Study*

19:17 only one who is good. Jesus does not deny that He Himself is good

(see Mark 10:17, 18; Luke 18:18, 19), nor that He can speak authoritatively about what is good. Rather, He challenges the superficial assumption behind the young man's question - that he is quite capable of performing a good deed worthy of access into God's Kingdom. God's law defines righteous behavior, so Jesus directs him first to a number of the Ten Commandments and the obligation to love one's neighbor as oneself (Lev. 19:18; Matt 22:39).

 

*Commentary: The NIV Study Bible*

19:21 If you would be perfect. Jesus knows the man's wealth has become his means to personal identity, power, and a sense of meaning in life —that it has become the idolatrous god of his life. Jesus' strategy is to turn this man from focusing on external conformity to the law to examining his heart, revealing his ruling god. give to the poor. The man had no doubt given some money to the poor, as the giving of alms was considered a pious duty, especially among the Pharisees. But Jesus calls him to give everything away, exchanging the god of wealth for the eternal treasure found in following Jesus as the one true God. Jesus' ultimate answer to the question posed in v. 16 ("What do to have eternal life?") is to follow him.

Saturday, April 24, 2021

Tokonaki ‘Epeleli 24, 2021 

And if your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off…

Pea ka ‘oku fakatūkia koe ‘e ho nima, pe ko ho va‘e, tu‘usi…

Matiu 18 (Matthew 18)

(v. 8-9) 8 And if your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life crippled or lame than with two hands or two feet to be thrown into the eternal fire. 9 And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire.

(v. 8-9) 8 Pea ka ‘oku fakatūkia koe ‘e ho nima, pe ko ho va‘e, tu‘usi, pea li‘aki atu: ‘oku ngutuhua ange ke ke a‘u ki he mo‘ui nima taha pe ve‘e taha, ‘i he lī koe nima ua pe ve‘e ua ki he afi ta‘engata. 9 Pea ka ‘oku fakatūkia koe ‘e ho mata, kape‘i ia, ‘o li‘aki atu: ‘oku ngutuhua ange ha‘o a‘u mata taha ki he mo‘ui, ‘I ho lī mata ua ki he afi ‘o Heli.

 

*Commentary: The Reformation Bible Study*

18:8, 9 Repeating His point from the Sermon on the Mount (5:29), Jesus insists that temptation to sin be resisted at all costs. Yet He has shown that the causes of sin are found not in the body's members (hand, foot, eye) but in the hidden treasury of one's heart (12:33-37; 15:17-20).

Mat 12:33-37  “Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad,  for the tree is known by its fruit. 34 You brood of vipers! How can you speak good, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. 35 The good person out of his good treasure brings forth good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure brings forth evil. 36 I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak, 37 for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

(15:17-20)17 Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the stomach and is expelled? 18 But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a person. 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander. 20 These are what defile a person. But to eat with unwashed hands does not defile anyone.”

Friday, April 23, 2021

Falaite ‘Epeleli 23, 2021 

And he was transfigured before them

Pea na‘e fakakehe hono anga´ ‘i honau ‘ao

Matiu 17 (Matthew 17)

(v. 2-3) 2 And he was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became white as light. 3 And behold, there appeared to them Moses and Elijah, talking with him.

(v. 2-3) 2 Pea na‘e fakakehe hono anga ‘i honau ‘ao, pea na‘e malama hono fōtunga ‘o hangē ko e la‘ā, pea ko hono ngaahi kofu na‘e hinaekiaki mai ‘o hangē ko e maama. 3 Pea tā na‘e hā kiate kinautolu ‘a Mōsese mo ‘Ilaisiā ‘oku nau talanoa mo ia.

 

*Commentary: David Guzik – Study Guide to Matthew*

He was transfigured before them: The word transfigured speaks of a transformation, not merely a change in outward appearance. The effect was extremely striking; Jesus became so bright in appearance that He was even difficult to look at (like the sun).

“The verb metamorphoo (‘transfigure,’ ‘transform,’ ‘change in form’) suggests a change of inmost nature that may be outwardly visible.” (Carson) It may be that this glory shone forth in the Garden of Gethsemane, when those who arrested Him fell back when Jesus said, “I am.”

“For Christ to be glorious was almost a less matter than for him to restrain or hide his glory. It is forever his glory that he concealed his glory; and that, though he was rich, for our sakes he became poor.” (Spurgeon)

Jesus has His disciples with Him when He shines in His glory. He is not glorified apart from them, because they share in His glory. Father, I desire that they also whom You gave Me may be with Me where I am, that they may behold My glory which You have given Me. (John 17:24)

(Mat 17:3) Moses and Elijah appear with Jesus.

And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, talking with Him.

Moses and Elijah: Remarkably, these two Old Testament persons appeared and spoke with the transfigured Jesus. Moses had lived some 1400 years before; Elijah some 900 years before; yet they were alive and in some sort of resurrected, glorified state.

It is fair to think that these two particular persons from the Old Testament appeared because they represent the Law (Moses) and the Prophets (Elijah). The sum of Old Testament revelation came to meet with Jesus at the Mount of Transfiguration.

We can also say that Moses and Elijah represent those who are caught up to God (Moses at Jude 9 and Elijah at 2 Kings 2:11). More specifically, Moses represents those who die and go to glory, and Elijah represents those who are caught up to heaven without death (as in the rapture described in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18).

From this we see: “Saints long departed still alive; live in their personality; are known by their names; and enjoy near access to Christ.” (Spurgeon)

Talking with Him: Luke 9:31 tells us the theme of their conversation; they spoke of His decease which He was about to accomplish at Jerusalem. They spoke of the upcoming work of the cross, and presumably of the resurrection to follow.

“And where could there have been found greater subjects than this wondrous death, and his glorious resurrection?” (Meyer)

“They ‘appeared unto them‘ but they ‘talked with him‘: the object of the two holy ones was not to converse with the apostles, but with their Master. Although saints are seen of men, their fellowship is with Jesus.” (Spurgeon)

GOD IS . . . (KO E ‘OTUA, ‘OKU . . )

4        GOD IS INFINITE

            The Worth of Christ

So we must avoid implying that the atonement was made by the human nature of Christ. Natures do nothing in the abstract. We are concerned about the concrete person in all of Christ's acts of mediation: the Son did this, or the Son did that. Christ the person atoned for sin because the atonement needed to be infinite in value. After all, one person died for millions and millions of persons. This is possible because God accepts the sacrifice of his Son; as Goodwin notes, "For as the offence is against an infinite glorious God, so the holy works are wrought by one as Infinite."

We cannot afford, then, to be tentative about the infinity of God. Our salvation rests on the fact that the Infinite One became man to die in the place of sinners, who transgressed against an infinitely holy God, who demanded justice if ever he would forgive us. Only the payment of his infinitely glorious Son would suffice.

In our finitude, we are unable to comprehend an infinite God, yet the gospel enables us to see so much more of God than would otherwise have been possible. As Thomas Goodwin notes,

The "back-parts" of God, which we call his attributes, his power, wisdom, truth, justice, which God calls his glory to Moses and which we cannot see and live: these are infinitely more really and substantially ... set forth to us, by what we know of Christ as a redeemer in the gospel; and do infinitely transcend whatever of them either was, or could have been expressed in millions of several worlds, filled all of them with several sorts of intelligent creatures, such as angels and men.

Thus, in the gospel not only are we saved by the infinite worth of Christ's sacrifice, but also in his death we have "infinitely" more knowledge of God than we could have had without the supernatural revelation of Christ.

Thursday, April 22, 2021

Tu’apulelulu ‘Epeleli 22, 2021 

“You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

Ko e MĪSAIA koe, ko e ‘ALO ‘O E ‘OTUA MO‘UI 

Matiu 16 (Matthew 16)

(v. 15-16) 15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

(v. 15-16) 15 Pea pehē ange ‘e ia, Ka ko hai au ‘i he lau ‘amoutolu? 16 Pea tali ‘e Saimone Pita, ‘o ne pehē, Ko e MĪSAIA koe, ko e ‘ALO ‘O E ‘OTUA MO‘UI.

 

*Commentary: The Reformation Bible Study*

16:15 who do you say that l am. The "you" is plural. Peter answers on behalf of the Twelve, and his confession of Jesus' identity sets the church apart from those outside its community, even those who admire Him from a distance.

16:16 Christ. Peter declares that Jesus is the Messiah and king prophesied in the OT (1:1).

the Son of the living God. In the OT, the anointed king is called a "son" of

God (2 Sam. 7:14; Ps. 2:7). Israel as a whole is also God's "son" (Ex. 4:22), and Jesus fulfills this status of Israel. As applied to Jesus, the title reflects Jesus' unique relation to the Father (11:27; 21:38)

Wednesday, April 21, 2021

 Pulelulu ‘Epeleli 21, 2021

to the lost sheep of the house of Israel

ki he fanga sipi kuo mole ‘i he hako ‘o ‘Isileli


Matiu 15 (Matthew 15)


(v. 24) He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”


(v. 24) Ka ka tali ‘e ia ‘o ne pehē, Kuo ‘ikai fekau mai au, ka ki he fanga sipi kuo mole ‘i he hako ‘o ‘Isileli.


*Commentary: The Reformation Bible Study* 


15:24 only to the lost sheep...of Israel. Before the resurrection, the "wall" dividing Israel from the Gentile nations (Eph. 2:14) still stood; and Jesus sent the Twelve to Israel's lost sheep (Matt.10:5, 6). Jesus came as the Messiah and heir to the throne of David to fulfill God's promises to the patriarchs (Rom. 15:8). Yet Jesus graciously responds to this Gentile woman's humility, lack of presumption, and unreserved confidence that His mercy and power are more than sufficient to overflow boundaries of the covenant community and to supply her daughter's desperate need.


Tuesday, April 20, 2021

 Tusite ‘Epeleli 20, 2021

And those in the boat worshiped him

Pea ko kinautolu na‘e ‘i he vaka na‘a nau tū‘ulutui kiate ia


Matiu 14 (Matthew 14)


(v.32-33) 32 And when they got into the boat, the wind ceased. 33 And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.”


(v.32-33) 32 Pea ‘i he‘ena heka ki he vaka na‘e tālolo ‘a e matangi. 33 Pea ko kinautolu na‘e ‘i he vaka na‘a nau tū‘ulutui kiate ia, ‘o nau pehē, Tā ko e ‘Alo ‘o e ‘Otua koe. 


*Commentary: The Reformation Bible Study* 


14:32, 33 the wind ceased...Son of God. Jesus again stills a storm (see 8:23-27), showing Himself to be the Lord of all creation, the One who rescues those who cry out to Him in distress (Ps. 107.23-32). This time His disciples have advanced from astonished confusion about His identity to confession that He is the Son of God, a title that expresses His messiahship and His deity, anticipating Peter's landmark confession near Caesarea Philippi (16:16).


Monday, April 19, 2021

 Monite ‘Epeleli 19, 2021

he told them many things in parables

na‘e lahi ‘ene lea kiate kinautolu ‘i he ngaahi fakatātā 


Matiu 13 (Matthew 13)


(v. 3) 3And he told them many things in parables, saying: “A sower went out to sow. 


(v. 3) Pea na‘e lahi ‘ene lea kiate kinautolu ‘i he ngaahi fakatātā, ‘o pehē, Ko eni, na‘e ‘alu atu ha tangata tūtuu‘i ke tūtuu‘i: 


*Commentary: The Reformation Bible Study* 


13:3 parables. The term "parable," like the OT term translated "proverb," refers broadly to a comparison of some sort. Jesus' parables are His distinctive teaching through brief comparisons or longer narratives. They usually have one central point, although some have multiple points of correspondence between elements in the story and the realities they symbolize; e.g., four soils referring to four types of hearers (13:18-23) or two sons symbolizing flagrant sinners and the judgmental self-righteous (Luke 15:1, 2, 17-32; cf. Matt. 21:28-32). Most of Jesus' parables are clear, but they also contain a depth of meaning that only one with a right relationship to Jesus can comprehend. It is only to the disciples that Jesus gives the interpretation of the parable of the sower (vv. 18-23) and the parable of the weeds (vv. 36-43). The ungodly miss this deeper meaning because their lack of a proper relationship with God has darkened their thoughts and hearts (Rom. 1:21).


GOD IS . . . (KO E ‘OTUA, ‘OKU . . )


4 GOD IS INFINITE 


The Worth of Christ


Some might worry that this means that the deity suffered, so they would then shrink back from affirming that the Son of God (the second person) died on the cross. But we can say that God the Son died because of the communication of properties, a theological term that, according to Francis Turretin, means that “the person indeed claims for itself the properties of both natures, but one nature does not claim for itself the properties of the other, which belong to the person.” The Westminster Confession of Faith summarizes this doctrine quite well: “Christ, in the work of mediation, acts according to both natures, by each nature doing that which is proper to itself; yet, by reason of the unity of the person, that which is proper to one nature is sometimes in Scripture attributed to the person denominated by the other nature" (8.7). Hence, we can predicate death or hunger to the person of the Son because of the communication of properties, even though only the human nature can experience death or hunger.


It follows, then, that we do not say that God suffered on the cross in an abstract or general way as the divine essence. However, when we speak of God the Son dying and shedding his blood (in line with Acts 20:28), we are speaking about the concrete person of Christ, the God-man.


We have to say that the person, not a nature, died. Jesus, the God-man, died on the cross. It was not simply the humanity of the God-man that died, for that would divide his person. The current status of Jesus helps us to understand this idea. We can rightly say that the person seated the right hand of God the Father is the second person of the Trinity. However, we would not claim that this person is only the divine nature of Jesus (leaving us with a vestige of Christ) since his human nature does not share in the divine essence of the Godhead. Rather, because of the communication of properties, we rightly state that Jesus, the God-man, is the second person of the Trinity. Similarly, when Thomas looked on the resurrected Christ, he cried out, "My Lord and my God!" (John 20:28). He did not qualify himself by stating, "Now, of course, I do not mean God in your humanity but only God in your divinity, even though my current amazement stems from seeing you in the flesh." He simply looked on Jesus and called him God.